CloudWatch vs. Grafana: Why Good Observability Doesn't Have to Cost a Fortune
When you start on AWS, you use CloudWatch. It's there, it's integrated, it works. But as your infrastructure grows, something paradoxical often happens: The bill for "Monitoring & Logs" climbs into the top 3 of your monthly AWS costs – often higher than the actual databases.
The reason: CloudWatch punishes you for looking closely. You pay for Custom Metrics, for Log Ingest, and for querying the data. This creates a dangerous incentive: "Log less to save money" – the opposite of good observability.
When doing an AWS Exit to Proxmox/Bare Metal, we replace CloudWatch with the modern gold standard of the open-source world: The Grafana Stack (often called LGTM: Loki, Grafana, Tempo, Mimir).
In this article, we show with hard numbers why this stack is not only cheaper but technically superior.
Table of Contents
- 1) The Stack Explained: What Replaces What?
- 2) The Cost Shock: Variable vs. Fixed Costs
- 3) Technical Superiority: More Than Just "Cheaper"
- 4) How OutaCloud Handles the Migration
- 5) Conclusion: Free Your Data
- Further Reading
- Don't Want to Do This Yourself?
- Sources
1) The Stack Explained: What Replaces What?
We don't build a "DIY stack" for our customers – we build an integrated enterprise solution. Here's the mapping from AWS to Open Source:
The Dashboard: Grafana (replaces CloudWatch Dashboards)
Grafana is the "face" of your observability.
The difference: CloudWatch can primarily only display AWS data. Grafana is data-source agnostic. It visualizes data from your Proxmox cluster, SQL databases, Jira, and even remaining AWS resources in a single-pane-of-glass.
The Metrics: Prometheus (replaces CloudWatch Metrics)
This is where numeric time series land (CPU, RAM, Request Rates).
The difference: Prometheus uses a "Pull Model" and the powerful query language PromQL. This allows complex mathematical operations across thousands of servers to be calculated in milliseconds – something that's often cumbersome and expensive with CloudWatch Metric Math.
The Logs: Grafana Loki (replaces CloudWatch Logs)
Loki is the highlight for developers. It's like "grep for the cloud."
The difference: CloudWatch Logs indexes the entire text of every log line. This makes ingestion expensive and searching slow. Loki indexes only the metadata (labels) like app=frontend, error=500. The actual log text is stored compressed (similar to S3). The result: Massively faster write access and tiny storage costs.
2) The Cost Shock: Variable vs. Fixed Costs
The strongest argument for switching is the pricing model. Let's compare AWS CloudWatch prices in the EU (Frankfurt) region.
Scenario: A medium-sized SaaS company.
- Logs: 1 TB ingest per month (about 33 GB/day – easily reached with microservices)
- Metrics: 2,000 Custom Metrics (e.g., business KPIs, detailed app metrics)
- Dashboards: 5 dashboards for the team
| Cost Factor | AWS CloudWatch (Variable) | Grafana Stack on Proxmox (Fixed) |
|---|---|---|
| Log Ingest | $570.00 ($0.57 per GB) | $0. Limited only by Disk I/O. |
| Log Archival | $33.00 ($0.033 per GB) | Included (on server NVMe/HDD). |
| Custom Metrics | $600.00 ($0.30 per metric) | $0. Limited only by RAM. |
| Dashboards | $15.00 ($3.00 per dashboard) | $0. Unlimited dashboards. |
| Alarms | $0.10 per alarm | $0. Unlimited alert rules. |
| TOTAL / Month | ~$1,218.00 | ~$0 (part of infrastructure flat) |
The reality: With AWS, costs scale linearly with your growth. On your own infrastructure (managed by OutaCloud), costs are flat. Whether you send 100 or 10,000 metrics costs us the same – it just uses a bit more RAM on the server you already have.
Want to calculate your savings potential? Use our Cloud Cost Calculator.
3) Technical Superiority: More Than Just "Cheaper"
A common objection is: "Will I lose the deep integration?"
No. In fact, you gain features that AWS doesn't offer like this.
Feature 1: Correlation (The Split-Screen)
In Grafana, you can see a spike in CPU load in one panel (Prometheus) and with one click display exactly the logs (Loki) for exactly that time period and that pod. This seamless connection is often missing in CloudWatch or requires switching between "Metrics" and "Log Insights."
Feature 2: Data Ownership & Retention
CloudWatch data belongs to Amazon. Exporting is expensive (egress fees).
Your Prometheus/Loki data lives on your ZFS volumes.
- AWS: Standard retention costs extra.
- Grafana/Loki: You decide. Want to keep compliance logs for 10 years? Just store them on cheap HDDs or Hetzner Storage Boxes.
Feature 3: Alerting Manager
The Prometheus Alertmanager is extremely flexible. It offers:
- Deduplication: Grouping similar alarms
- Intelligent Routing: Database alarms → DB team, Frontend → Slack channel #frontend
With CloudWatch, you pay for each alarm individually and the logic is often rigid.
4) How OutaCloud Handles the Migration
We know nobody wants to write YAML configs. That's why our Proxmox Monitoring is a "Batteries Included" service.
Deployment
We roll out the complete stack (Loki, Prometheus, Grafana, Alertmanager) containerized on your cluster.
Agents
We install node_exporter (for hardware metrics) and promtail (for logs) on your VMs and hosts.
Dashboards
We create individual and customized dashboards for your infrastructure – Linux, Docker, Postgres, Nginx, and your specific applications. You have full visibility from day 1.
AWS Bridge
During the migration, we use the cloudwatch-exporter. This lets Grafana pull data from AWS. So you see your old and new world in one dashboard until the move is complete.
5) Conclusion: Free Your Data
Observability should help you find bugs – not blow holes in your budget. Switching from CloudWatch to Grafana/Prometheus is one of the most satisfying steps in a cloud exit: The tools are faster, look better, and cost a fraction.
Want to see what your infrastructure looks like in Grafana?
As part of our migration analysis, we'll happily show you demo dashboards and calculate how much you'll save just from eliminating CloudWatch fees.
Further Reading
These guides might also interest you:
- Bye Bye RDS: Managed PostgreSQL on Proxmox – Database migration from AWS
- AWS S3 Exit Guide: Migration to Hetzner & Ceph – Storage migration with rclone
- Exit AWS – Overview of our AWS migration services
- AWS to Hetzner – Our migration service for switching to Hetzner
Don't Want to Do This Yourself?
At OutaCloud, we handle the complete migration for you – including observability stack setup.
Start here:
- Exit AWS – Overview of our AWS migration services
- Proxmox Monitoring – Our monitoring service
- Calculate Your Savings – See how much you could save
Or contact us directly for a free migration analysis.
Sources
AWS CloudWatch Pricing
- Amazon CloudWatch Pricing – Official AWS pricing page with breakdown of components (Logs, Metrics, Dashboards, Alarms)
- How AWS CloudWatch Pricing Works – Lumigo: Detailed explanation of CloudWatch cost structure
- AWS CloudWatch Logs & Metrics Cost Optimization – CloudKeeper: Cost optimization strategies
- AWS CloudWatch Pricing Tiers & Rates – ShadhinLab: Pricing overview with concrete numbers
- New Amazon CloudWatch Log Class – AWS Blog: Introduction of Infrequent Access Log Class
- Determine which log group is causing a bill increase – AWS re:Post: Identifying cost drivers
- Understanding AWS CloudWatch Pricing – AWS Fundamentals: Comprehensive pricing guide
Prometheus & Grafana
- Prometheus Overview – Official Prometheus documentation on Pull Model and TSDB
- Is Prometheus Monitoring Push or Pull? – SigNoz: Technical explanation of the Pull Model
- Grafana Loki Documentation – Official Loki documentation
- Understand Labels in Loki – Grafana Labs: Label-based indexing explained
- Loki Overview – Grafana Labs: Architecture overview with focus on efficiency
Cloud Migration Service
Break free from the cloud cost trap - up to 90% savings.